The Argument for (more) Competency Based Education

Published by Carrie O'Donnell
on Apr 16, 2016

A few weeks ago I finished a book by Todd Rose called The End of Average, and I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it since.


For more than 25 years I have worked in education, initially in college textbook publishing and then in consumer publishing at Harper Collins, where my focus on reference and serious non-fiction titles led me to the dot.com world and eventually back to education. Whereas textbook publishing in those days was more of a commodity/one-size-fits-all type sale, consumer publishing was more compelling: how to promote individual authors with all their fascinating idiosyncrasies–world leaders who bathed in tea at night while on book tours and celebrities who sent publicists to do their personal shopping.  

For the past nine years, I’ve been with  O’Donnell Learn, where I started out as VP of Business Development and Marketing and am now the president. In this time, I’ve witnessed a lot of changes in education, especially in regards to content development and delivery, as I’m sure you have too. As with the move from print to digital, there have been many “disruptions” to the way educators, thought leaders and higher ed institutions have begun to look at how learners learn.


One of the most inspiring developments in education is the focus on personalized learning and individual learning pathways. A subset of personalized learning that has started to gain traction is competency-based education (CBE). In his book, Todd Rose addresses how our 21st-century workforce is desperate for workers who’ve had a 21st-century education and can graduate with the competencies that make them ready to work. Before he lays out this thesis with sound examples, he explains where we are today, and how we got here.


Rose begins his book (a very quick, informative, and easy read) with a tangible example of how there is no such thing as an average person. He details the history of the development of the seat for fighter pilot planes and how they were designed for the average body of fighter pilots. He explains how every part of the average body was taken from data of a selection of pilots, but how none of those pilots embodied every average measurement. Another example is one about the ideal woman and how her measurements were determined. Surprise, no woman met all of those measurements (thus the torture of shopping for jeans). Rose explains the history of how the “science” of creating averages came to be accepted as an application for measuring and determining value, achievement, and success in almost all aspects of our business and education systems.


The book has no lack of understanding of the detriment caused by the continued attachment to the “averegarian” approach. Rose chronicles his personal struggle with not meeting the standards set before him. He was tracked early as not being up to snuff because he didn’t test well or grasp some concepts and drills as quickly as he should have. Against all odds and despite standardized tests, he got into college.  As an adult learner with family and work responsibilities, he used his unique approach to college completion: He enrolled in classes he knew he would enjoy and succeed in first, so he could feel a sense of satisfaction and work on mastering his study skills. He’s now the director of the “Mind, Brain, and Education” program at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.


CBE is one approach to higher education curriculum that Rose champions. CBE and stacked or scaffolded CBE makes a lot of sense for many modern students. Now, I’m not knocking a traditional university experience where students live and learn in environments in which they can discover their purpose and calling. But that’s a luxurious experience not every student can take advantage of these days. Also, most 21st-century businesses need graduates that can demonstrate skill mastery on the first day of work.  Institutions that employ CBE (and they are a diverse lot such as Western Governors University, University of  Texas, or College for America) offer curricula in which students gain proficiency because they promote the following:

  • Allow students to self-pace their learning, which is usually based not on a fixed semester (Carnegie units or seat time) but on demonstration of mastery
  • Provide different ways for students to tackle a curriculum, choosing which competencies they want to master first, how they want to approach the learning–whether through first reading the content or checking out the assessment and rubric, or another sequence
  • Typically incorporate employer input into the design of the competencies, skills, and assessments so that students get real-life learning
  • Enable students to show what they’ve learned by completing a credential or project that is often scenario-based and placed within an authentic context
  • Encourage students to work with mentors and coaches as well as faculty or subject matter experts (based on the understanding that learning is not just about gaining skills or understanding but also about motivation, support, and teamwork–all good relationship skills to bring to the work environment)
  • Often connect students with employers, so they graduate not only workforce-ready but with employment opportunities
  • Offer a flexible approach for adult learners who are juggling families and jobs while they try to gain more skills and knowledge
  • Though CBE  has become more popular, growing from about 20 programs in 2012 to close to 600 in 2016, it’s only used by a small percentage of higher ed institutions overall. Its nascent state is in part due to the challenges that it faces. These include the startup costs of creating CBE programs, adjusting back-office systems, accommodating accreditor and financial aid requirements, finding the right platform fit, and much more. But the situation is improving, and the K-12 world is beginning to look seriously at CBE too.  

So does this mean by 2017 we could be nearing a CBE tipping point? That would be good news as CBE is one of the most tangible and workforce-aligned curriculum approaches to materialize in quite some time. It might not be for everyone, but it fosters an experience where truly individualized learning can take place and students can learn 21st Century skills.


Finally, if you’ve read The End of Average, please let me know your take-away thoughts. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

INSIGHTS

Higher Ed Has the Toolset, But Do They Have the Mindset to Future-fit?

Published By Joana Jebsen
on Aug 12, 2021

Imagine a fresh-faced eighteen year old, naive to the great big world ahead, hoping for an acceptance into an accredited two or four year college. They’re navigating the long hall towards their college counselor’s office, reviewing the list of schools in their mind, while envisioning a future of friends, inspiring courses and eventually a career, a life. College, whether community or four year, will be their first steps towards adulthood, towards maturity, or so they think.  What they don't know, what they aren’t told, is that most higher education is unequipped to prepare them for life. The real responsibilities they’ll meet when they exit campus are not delineated, explored or taught in school.  To make matters more complicated, the notion of the “traditional student” no longer exists. Students are opting out of four year residential colleges for two year schools and online programs. They’re also delaying the start of college in pursuit of a career. Additionally, there’s been an enormous uptick in adult learners, with families, who start school later, or attend school in tandem with a job. It’s clear: there’s a broken talent pipeline. And an enormous question: is higher education fit for the future?

Looking Back/Learning Forward: Lessons For the Now Normal

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 20, 2021

Looking Back, Learning Forward, a motto and mindset to utilize as we envision the future of distance education and fuse historic learning practices with modern lifestyles. I recently co-hosted a webinar with Dr. Jim Julius, Faculty Director of Online Learning at Mira Costa College, where we walked a group of educators through insights gathered over the last fourteen months of online learning. If one thing is clear, it is that it’s been a journey for everyone: faculty, students, education consultants, learning designers, institutional leadership, and families alike. 

Launching Faculty Learning Communities: Participation is All About Perceived Value

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 14, 2021

In an earlier webinar, O’Donnell Learn CEO, Carrie O’Donnell and I shared practical ideas and examples for building learning communities among faculty. These communities provide a rich opportunity for faculty to gather around a common goal, learning together and from each other while accomplishing a desired outcome.   Faculty learning communities can provide the time, space and resources for mission-critical efforts related to teaching and learning. Teaching expertise is most often not part of the faculty background, nor is instructional design a common skill. Plus, faculty often develop courses in isolation. In contrast, gathering faculty around learning design can create vibrant exchanges of what’s working, what’s not, and problem-solving around how to make improvements.