Should We Unbundle the Degree?

Published by Carrie O'Donnell
on Jan 09, 2020

The topic of unbundling the degree still brings mixed responses, even in discussions I had while attending a number of conferences during 2019. Some support unbundling the degree because it offers students greater control over their education – and a more direct path toward successful workforce preparedness. Others expressed concern that unbundling the degree would compete with traditional degree programs on campuses already battling declining retention rates.

However, recent evidence combined with those same declining retention rates tells me that perhaps the time has come for the conversation to no longer be about if higher education should unbundle the degree, but how.

Many recent reports indicate that employers find recent graduates lacking in soft skills, sometimes referred to as employability skills, that are critical for career success. According to The Hechinger Report, 76-90% executives and hiring managers surveyed most value the following skills:

  • Verbal and written communication

  • Critical thinking and analytical reasoning

  • Ethical decision-making

  • Applying knowledge to real-world situations

  • Works independently; prioritization of tasks, time management

  • Takes initiative, proactive, self-motivated

  • Effective team working

  • Complex problem-solving

The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) recently shared that 3 in 4 employers are struggling to find graduates proficient in these necessary soft skills. In fact, SHRM indicates that 51 percent of its members surveyed believe higher education is not helping stem the shortage in soft and employability skills. According to recent parallel surveys of employers and students by the National Association of Colleges of Employers (NACE), there is a vast discrepancy between the percentage of employers and students who rate recent graduates as proficient in “career readiness” skills.

Compounding this challenge is that companies seeking candidates with four-year degrees has become the norm, even for positions that previously required an associate degree or less. The four-year degree has become the standard for “well-qualified” when in fact, many of the graduates were not fully qualified, due to a lack of the skills listed above.

In response to this, many companies including Apple, Google, Bank of America and IBM have stripped away the four-year degree requirement in favor of hiring candidates equipped with competency in the right skills.

This brings us back to the question about unbundling the degree. If companies are rethinking how they hire and choosing skills over degrees, shouldn’t we also be rethinking how we prepare students for those jobs – particularly the underserved and lower-income students – and offer them the most efficient and cost-effective route to creating a future? I say yes.

Unbundling the general education path and aligning it around workforce needs means students can customize their college experience and develop competencies in the skill sets required for their chosen career. Including those missing soft skills. It means students can both increase their likelihood of being hired and achieving career success. And isn’t that what students believe a college education is all about? Let’s make it so.

Carrie O’Donnell is the CEO of O’Donnell Learn, a leading learning experience (LX) design firm dedicated to helping learners achieve their goals and flourish in life. ODL is passionate about partnering with institutions and their faculty to deliver learner-centered design and innovation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Higher Ed Has the Toolset, But Do They Have the Mindset to Future-fit?

Published By Joana Jebsen
on Aug 12, 2021

Imagine a fresh-faced eighteen year old, naive to the great big world ahead, hoping for an acceptance into an accredited two or four year college. They’re navigating the long hall towards their college counselor’s office, reviewing the list of schools in their mind, while envisioning a future of friends, inspiring courses and eventually a career, a life. College, whether community or four year, will be their first steps towards adulthood, towards maturity, or so they think.  What they don't know, what they aren’t told, is that most higher education is unequipped to prepare them for life. The real responsibilities they’ll meet when they exit campus are not delineated, explored or taught in school.  To make matters more complicated, the notion of the “traditional student” no longer exists. Students are opting out of four year residential colleges for two year schools and online programs. They’re also delaying the start of college in pursuit of a career. Additionally, there’s been an enormous uptick in adult learners, with families, who start school later, or attend school in tandem with a job. It’s clear: there’s a broken talent pipeline. And an enormous question: is higher education fit for the future?

Looking Back/Learning Forward: Lessons For the Now Normal

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 20, 2021

Looking Back, Learning Forward, a motto and mindset to utilize as we envision the future of distance education and fuse historic learning practices with modern lifestyles. I recently co-hosted a webinar with Dr. Jim Julius, Faculty Director of Online Learning at Mira Costa College, where we walked a group of educators through insights gathered over the last fourteen months of online learning. If one thing is clear, it is that it’s been a journey for everyone: faculty, students, education consultants, learning designers, institutional leadership, and families alike. 

Launching Faculty Learning Communities: Participation is All About Perceived Value

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 14, 2021

In an earlier webinar, O’Donnell Learn CEO, Carrie O’Donnell and I shared practical ideas and examples for building learning communities among faculty. These communities provide a rich opportunity for faculty to gather around a common goal, learning together and from each other while accomplishing a desired outcome.   Faculty learning communities can provide the time, space and resources for mission-critical efforts related to teaching and learning. Teaching expertise is most often not part of the faculty background, nor is instructional design a common skill. Plus, faculty often develop courses in isolation. In contrast, gathering faculty around learning design can create vibrant exchanges of what’s working, what’s not, and problem-solving around how to make improvements.