Purposeful Learning FrameworkTM – Why People are at the Center of Everything We Do

Published by Carrie O'Donnell
on Jan 15, 2021

I’m often asked why our company is so good at collaborating with  faculty. The first time I heard this question, I didn’t realize clients found this unique to O’Donnell Learn. We’ve always been great partners  because people are at the heart of everything we do. In fact, our entire design philosophy – Purposeful Learning DesignTM – is anchored around people. 

It starts with this truth: learning is for people. As such, learning design should be grounded in empathy and it should promote success for both learners and faculty. Purposeful Learning Design is the philosophy we embrace to ensure we never lose sight of this truth. It is comprised of six key considerations.

People-Centricity: As designers and learners, we fully embrace the needs of everyone involved. Our goal is to humanize the learning experience and make it welcoming and belonging for all. For example, we begin with empathy for the learner to understand how key elements of the learning might affect learner success. When we collaborate with faculty we focus on how to bring their expertise alive in an engaging and effective way.

Evidence-Based Best Practices: Our practice is guided and informed by a large body of research in both learning practices and learning science. Our process validates these best practices, because we encourage built-in feedback loops to help faculty evolve the experience by listening to their students.

Accessibility & Inclusivity: It’s impossible to create great learning experiences without considering the needs of all learners. Ensuring equity, parity and access for all learners means creating flexible learning experiences that provide alternative pathways of access and choices for how to engage and learn.

Collaboration & Engagement: In learning and design, people achieve more together. We live this every day. Our entire company is virtual. One of our greatest strengths is our practice of collaboration, which fosters each other’s strengths. The same is true for faculty-to-designer, peer-to-peer and faculty-to-student. We all thrive better together.

Backward Design: If learner success is the goal of the learning experience, then you need to define success by creating clear, measurable outcomes. Once you know where you want your learners to land, designing the path for getting there is clear. What’s really beautiful about backward design is that it focuses us on mastery and giving learners the path(s) to achieve success.

Active Learning: People learn by doing. There’s only so much that can be learned without the action of applying new knowledge and experiencing the results. Without the “doing”, there’s no success or failure, no understanding what works, what doesn’t and why. And no opportunity to improve and grow.

When I launched O’Donnell Learn 30 years ago, it was because I believed technology could change the way people learn. I wanted to be part of that. Helping evolve and improve learning, helping advance learner success. And while where we started is different than where we are today, people have always been – and always will be – at the heart of what’s important to making that happen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

INSIGHTS

Learn While Doing: Course Innovations in Real Time

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Mar 30, 2021

We recently learned there are approximately 20,000 learning designers in the US compared to over 1,500,000 faculty creating online courses. Additionally, a study we conducted last summer with 475 higher ed faculty revealed: Nearly half were simply mirroring their face-to-face instruction, Only 22% were designing their courses differently for online, More than 40% had never taught online or had only taught online for one to two terms. But here’s an even more startling fact: faculty were spending nearly 49 hours prepping an online course for the first time. Converting an existing course for online? Twenty-three hours.

Right Now, External Partners Might Be Higher Ed’s Greatest Ally

Published By Joana Jebsen
on Mar 09, 2021

A recent Hechinger report raised the alarm on the increasing amount of OPM contracts secured in 2020. While there seems to be great concern over the cost and number of these contracts, there also seems to be a lack of correlation between this increase and the pandemic. Have we all forgotten the sudden shift to online learning every university across the nation had to make? Whatever online learning institutions had in place at the time, if any, had to be scaled on a massive level.

Propel: Driving Learner Success Through Purposeful Instructor Support

Published By Carrie O'Donnell
on Mar 05, 2021

In a study we conducted last summer with nearly 500 higher education faculty, we learned most were spending 49 hours prepping new online courses prior to the start of the semester. For existing courses, 23 hours per course. And fine tuning content throughout the term? Eight hours per week. This is in addition to teaching, not to mention other duties like research and service. However, we also learned that while most were confident in their ability to teach online, 42% have little experience and nearly half were attempting to mirror their face-to-face teaching in the online environment. Both of these factors are strong indicators of not understanding the intentionality involved in developing and delivering effective online courses. As we move beyond emergency remote instruction towards improving the online learning experience, how do we ask faculty to do even more preparation? The reality is, we shouldn’t. Instead we should purposefully support instructors to help them more effectively and efficiently develop their online courses.