Could Micro-credentials Solve Macro Problems like College Completion?

Published by Joana Jebsen
on Dec 05, 2019

Last month, the National Student Clearinghouse® (NSC) Research Center ™ released a report on the 36 million Americans who started college but did not complete. The report accounts for 97% of post secondary enrollments in the US and includes data at the state level.

Notable is the 22 percent increase in “some college, no degree” students in the five years since the center’s previous findings, issued in 2014. Most of those that didn’t complete a degree are close to middle age and left college nearly a decade ago after two years or less. More than half are women and left college when they were in their 20’s or younger.

Also significant is that 25% of students identified as “some college, no degree” in the 2014 report have since re-enrolled and completed a degree or credential. Another 1.1 million have re-enrolled and were still enrolled as of December, 2018. With 54 percent of re-enrolled students earning a degree or credential, or on track to complete, there’s hope of turning the tide on students who embarked on a degree, but had no payout for the effort.

A recent Inside Higher Ed article provides a solid recap of the report’s top data highlights. Though the data doesn’t provide specifics as to why students left, for example, changing financial or life needs, general decline in interest or discouragement due to lack of success, the report suggests they’re returning for career needs and/or motivated for a specific purpose. To me this speaks to a growing and perhaps even more urgent need for modular learning — professional certificates and stackable microcredentials – especially given the growing percentage of jobs at risk due to automation, and hiring managers indicating key soft skills are missing from graduates’ repertoires.

Sanjay Sarma, vice president for Open Learning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, offers this insight: “The whole model that you go to college for two years or four years and you’re ready for the rest of your life — that’s predicated on a pace of change of a bygone era.”

Sarma suggests that colleges also “offer ‘smaller modules of learning’ — like microcredentials, bootcamps, and programs that blend online and on-campus education — and deliver them in ways that accommodate the schedules of working people.”

But before modular learning can help provide a solution to the degree completion challenge, it needs to become more widespread. Currently alternative credentialing still lacks market traction. The 2019 EDCAUSE Horizon Report states, “Only 2% of institutions have deployed digital microcredentials (including badging) institution-wide, but 29% are expanding or planning their use. The number of on-ground alternative credentialing is also still in its nascent stage.

Plus, micro-credentialing needs to be anchored in the mastery of specific skill sets, to help ensure that re-enrolling students can put the newly earned credential to practical use directly. Most of the micro-credentialing currently in place is not targeting the “some college, no degree” population. Instead it is helping those who are already are degreed.

In a recent article, Sean Gallagher, executive director of Northeastern University’s Center for the Future of Higher Education and Talent Strategy, says “There’s a lot of work still to do if we want micro-credentials and MOOCs to emerge as an alternative to an undergraduate degree and also to serve a more historically disadvantaged population that has not had access to the institutions that are providing these offerings.”

Encouraging the “some college, no degree” adult learner back will require a collaborative effort among state policy makers, higher education institutions (using a non-siloed approach across many departments), third party credential providers, as well as partnerships with regional employers. Let’s also not forget the voice of the adult learner. To ensure their context is understood we also need good learner-centered design, brought by skilled learning experience design (LXD) teams within HE institutions or sourced with outside LXD service providers.

To move the needle on college completion, all parties that potentially affect the former student’s decision to return need to be part of the overall solution. But I believe it’s possible. And a focus on micro-credentials – specific practical and applicable workforce skills – is a great first step to getting there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

INSIGHTS

Higher Ed Has the Toolset, But Do They Have the Mindset to Future-fit?

Published By Joana Jebsen
on Aug 12, 2021

Imagine a fresh-faced eighteen year old, naive to the great big world ahead, hoping for an acceptance into an accredited two or four year college. They’re navigating the long hall towards their college counselor’s office, reviewing the list of schools in their mind, while envisioning a future of friends, inspiring courses and eventually a career, a life. College, whether community or four year, will be their first steps towards adulthood, towards maturity, or so they think.  What they don't know, what they aren’t told, is that most higher education is unequipped to prepare them for life. The real responsibilities they’ll meet when they exit campus are not delineated, explored or taught in school.  To make matters more complicated, the notion of the “traditional student” no longer exists. Students are opting out of four year residential colleges for two year schools and online programs. They’re also delaying the start of college in pursuit of a career. Additionally, there’s been an enormous uptick in adult learners, with families, who start school later, or attend school in tandem with a job. It’s clear: there’s a broken talent pipeline. And an enormous question: is higher education fit for the future?

Looking Back/Learning Forward: Lessons For the Now Normal

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 20, 2021

Looking Back, Learning Forward, a motto and mindset to utilize as we envision the future of distance education and fuse historic learning practices with modern lifestyles. I recently co-hosted a webinar with Dr. Jim Julius, Faculty Director of Online Learning at Mira Costa College, where we walked a group of educators through insights gathered over the last fourteen months of online learning. If one thing is clear, it is that it’s been a journey for everyone: faculty, students, education consultants, learning designers, institutional leadership, and families alike. 

Launching Faculty Learning Communities: Participation is All About Perceived Value

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 14, 2021

In an earlier webinar, O’Donnell Learn CEO, Carrie O’Donnell and I shared practical ideas and examples for building learning communities among faculty. These communities provide a rich opportunity for faculty to gather around a common goal, learning together and from each other while accomplishing a desired outcome.   Faculty learning communities can provide the time, space and resources for mission-critical efforts related to teaching and learning. Teaching expertise is most often not part of the faculty background, nor is instructional design a common skill. Plus, faculty often develop courses in isolation. In contrast, gathering faculty around learning design can create vibrant exchanges of what’s working, what’s not, and problem-solving around how to make improvements.