Can Mastery Reduce the Emotional Cost of Traditional Learning?

Published by Carrie O'Donnell
on Aug 29, 2019

Nearly everyone I talk with has his or her own version of the same story. A workshop, class or even an entire semester that defeated them. A learning experience when victory was not to be had.

These memories often bring with them a sense of embarrassment, shame, disappointing others, lowered self-esteem and in some cases, isolation or feeling ostracized by the more successful students.

In a previous post, I shared the importance of designing learning experiences to promote mastery, not failure. It’s well-known that the increasing drop-out rates for high school and higher education students bear a significant economic impact on society. But what about the “emotional cost” to society as well? A cost that’s not easily conveyed in dollars and cents when determining its impact, but is seen in the headlines every day. What does it cost us individually and as a society when a student’s journey is forced into another direction by defeat?

In his TED talk a few years ago, “Let’s teach for mastery – not test scores”, Sal Khan, the entrepreneur that launched Khan Academy out of what began as YouTube videos to help his cousins understand math, shares his belief that students can become scholars if they are helped to master concepts at their own place. He talks about how the current education model helps to reveal gaps in learning, but nothing is actually done to close the gaps before moving onto the next round of content. Test scores reveal a student’s gap in learning and those test scores are simply accepted as part of the grading curve.

What does it cost us individually and as a society when a student’s journey is forced into another direction by defeat?

Kahn relates this process to that of building a house within artificial time constraints. If at each step of the building process, from the foundation up through each floor, the inspector accepts gaps in construction and let’s the building continue to meet the deadline, eventually, the entire structure will fall in on itself. And so is true of the student who is forced to carry learning gaps forward until they can no longer proceed.The gaps become too large to overcome.

Exceptional LX design focuses on the learner’s needs first and then promotes mastery by creating engaging experiences around those needs. Progress through the learning experience happens when mastery occurs. Learning is built upon learning.

Put yourself in a mastery scenario and imagine what that feels like. It’s easy to see how students, when given the opportunity to succeed, might find learning fun and more exciting.

How those experiences could encourage confidence and foster a desire for growth and lifelong learning.

Kahn said, “If we let people tap into their potential, by mastering concepts, by exercising agency over their learning, they will get there.”

Now, let’s imagine the emotional benefit of that on our society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


“See each other for the humanity that holds us” Lessons in Trauma Informed Pedagogy from Mays Imad

Published By Cathryn Mattimore
on Oct 20, 2021

O’Donnell Learn recently hosted a webinar led by Mays Imad, Ph.D. as a part of its recent Purposeful Learning Festival focused on mental health and wellness. Dr. Imad is a thought leader in trauma-informed pedagogy and a professor at Pima Community College based in Tucson, Arizona where she is also the coordinator of the Teaching & Learning Center. As a current Master’s of Education student at Northeastern University who also lives with mental illness, I was excited to learn more about using the classroom, virtual or traditional, as a safe place for learners to heal and grow. I met virtually with Dr. Imad to hear more about her teaching philosophy, beliefs surrounding mental health, and ways to ensure student success in uncertain times.

Higher Ed Has the Toolset, But Do They Have the Mindset to Future-fit?

Published By Joana Jebsen
on Aug 12, 2021

Imagine a fresh-faced eighteen year old, naive to the great big world ahead, hoping for an acceptance into an accredited two or four year college. They’re navigating the long hall towards their college counselor’s office, reviewing the list of schools in their mind, while envisioning a future of friends, inspiring courses and eventually a career, a life. College, whether community or four year, will be their first steps towards adulthood, towards maturity, or so they think.  What they don't know, what they aren’t told, is that most higher education is unequipped to prepare them for life. The real responsibilities they’ll meet when they exit campus are not delineated, explored or taught in school.  To make matters more complicated, the notion of the “traditional student” no longer exists. Students are opting out of four year residential colleges for two year schools and online programs. They’re also delaying the start of college in pursuit of a career. Additionally, there’s been an enormous uptick in adult learners, with families, who start school later, or attend school in tandem with a job. It’s clear: there’s a broken talent pipeline. And an enormous question: is higher education fit for the future?

Looking Back/Learning Forward: Lessons For the Now Normal

Published By Brett Christie, PhD
on Jul 20, 2021

Looking Back, Learning Forward, a motto and mindset to utilize as we envision the future of distance education and fuse historic learning practices with modern lifestyles. I recently co-hosted a webinar with Dr. Jim Julius, Faculty Director of Online Learning at Mira Costa College, where we walked a group of educators through insights gathered over the last fourteen months of online learning. If one thing is clear, it is that it’s been a journey for everyone: faculty, students, education consultants, learning designers, institutional leadership, and families alike.