Can Higher Ed Combine Silos to Advance the Learning Experience? – O'Donnell Learn

Can Higher Ed Combine Silos to Advance the Learning Experience?

Published by Carrie O'Donnell
on Nov 07, 2019

In the past few months, I have been traveling around the country, conversing with university leaders about changing the learning experience, making it more relevant and successful for today’s learners—for working adults, for underserved populations, etc. What strikes me, is that we have siloed out our change drivers so that each becomes a niche. This results in none being as effective as they should be. These include: OER (open education resources), digital delivery and education technology, online learning, and professional and continuing education. Each of these has its own initiatives, its own departments or centers on campus, and even its own associations.

I have recently attended conferences sponsored by organizations who live in these silos: UPCEA for professional and continuing ed, Open Ed for OER, WCET for technology-enhanced learning, OLC for online learning. These are vital organizations and important vehicles for academic leaders and innovators to learn, to exchange ideas and best practices, to collaborate, and to energize. I am not looking to minimize their importance. Yet, there is a huge amount of overlap, and many of the most successful initiatives combine more than one of these–such as fully OER online stackable credentials.

It seems that there is room for the leaders in each of these silos to come together in some sort of structured collaboration. I envision a dialog around innovation and change that takes the best from each silo, that gets institutions thinking about minimizing silos in order to advance learning.

Given that a blog post doesn’t have any constraints, I am going to blue sky some ideas–a “what if” scenario:

1. An uber fall conference on learning experience and business model innovation.

  • Designed by our best learning designers so that we actually practice what we preach. Maybe it looks more like a Boy Scout Jamboree and less like a lecture-based conference.

  • Lots of best-practice sharing and opportunities to explore the successes and challenges of leaders, and to bring their learnings into your context.

  • More design thinking and “learn by doing” so that leaders can build (or flex) their innovation-management muscles.

  • Including mini-conference experiences that enable each organization to break out, meet and have a focused event.

2. Cross-organization cohorts that collaborate to design, experiment, iterate and share out their learnings around specific issues or initiatives, such as how to sustain innovation or how to evolve business models at an institution or system. Think Conference Board…

3. Summer institutes hosted by member institutions (kind of like the OLC Collaborate meetings) that enable cross-institutional learning and collaboration and a deeper dive then you can get at a conference. Again, the end game is an implementable action plan that will work within the specific context of each institution.

Higher ed institutions are hotbeds for innovations that are too often siloed off into a little corner of the institution or a niche within the ecosystem. Historically, change has been notoriously slow in higher education; yet, the need for change is urgent. Let’s find ways to break down the silos and leave our old ways of convening behind. Let’s find new ways to collaborate in order to solve existing problems and tackle the myriad challenges that are just around the corner.


The WOW Factor: Creating Faculty Development That Sparks Interest and Envy

Published By Carrie O'Donnell
on Jan 19, 2021

Imagine our surprise last summer when we reached out to 475 faculty and learned the online courses for nearly half were simply mirrors of their face-to-face instruction. In fact, only 22% were designing their courses differently for online. With all of the faculty development around online learning being offered, why weren’t more faculty designing courses specifically for this type of instruction? As it turns out, faculty weren’t engaging with development options at a level you might expect given COVID-19 and the rapid shift to online learning. Something we’d also learned in surveys and interviews with170 provosts and academic leaders a year earlier. The solution? The WOW Factor.

Purposeful Learning DesignTM – Why People are at the Center of Everything We Do

Published By Carrie O'Donnell
on Jan 15, 2021

I’m often asked why our company is so good at collaborating with  faculty. The first time I heard this question, I didn’t realize clients found this unique to O’Donnell Learn. We’ve always been great partners  because people are at the heart of everything we do. In fact, our entire design philosophy - Purposeful Learning DesignTM - is anchored around people.  It starts with this truth: learning is for people. As such, learning design should be grounded in empathy and it should promote success for both learners and faculty. Purposeful Learning Design is the philosophy we embrace to ensure we never lose sight of this truth. It is comprised of six key considerations.

2020 Reflective: Breathe Deep and Stay Agile

Published By Joana Jebsen
on Dec 22, 2020

While end-of-year survey results are still to come for how enrolled students are evaluating their 2020 college experience, I queried two of our staff, both students, about their overall experience and considered how these compared to what I was seeing with O’Donnell Learn clients. Kellie, our graphic design intern, just completed her Associates Degree in Graphic design. Prior to 2020, all of her courses met on campus. Cathryn, a Learning Design Associate is currently enrolled in an online Master of Education program in eLearning and Instructional Design. As this program was conceived as online delivery, it serves as a benchmark to compare against courses that were forced by COVID to switch delivery modes.